I think you guys are all forgetting that this server was made to open the Pokemon games to those unable to download Pixelmon (R.I.P.)
And? What difference does this make?
or without access to the original games. But like many companies and businesses in our world, it was intended to make a profit.
It's almost as if I gave reasons why implementing my changes would increase a companies profit and expressed understanding that they do want to make profit, and would obviously still keep some more fair p2w elements.
If youtruly want to make a difference how this server is run, don't whine about how it has some unfair qualities.
What do you expect me to do, not point out what needs to be changed, how else am I to impact how the server is run?
Lucar1o, it is my personal opinion (that I'm entitled to) that Pokefind was created with players and profit in mind
Ok? But opinions can be wrong. It's my opinion that it's not. Opinions do not mean anything without facts statistics or evidence behind them and I used facts which are used with the f2p model in many other games and servers.
I don't see a problem with a server offering players the option to spend a few dollars or a lot of dollars to buy a few extra pixels that won't help them at all in life
Red Herring
Ignoratio elenchi
(also known as: beside the point, misdirection [form of], changing the subject, false emphasis, the Chewbacca defense, irrelevant conclusion, irrelevant thesis, clouding the issue, ignorance of refutation)
Description: Attempting to redirect the argument to another issue to which the person doing the redirecting can better respond. While it is similar to the
avoiding the issue fallacy, the
red herring is a deliberate diversion of attention with the intention of trying to abandon the original argument.
Logical Form:
Argument A is presented by person 1.
Person 2 introduces argument B.
Argument A is abandoned.
Example #1:
Mike: It is morally wrong to cheat on your spouse, why on earth would you have done that?
Ken: But what is morality exactly?
Mike: It’s a code of conduct shared by cultures.
Ken: But who creates this code?...
We arn't talking about real life, we are talking about the server. No servers give IRL benefits for there ranks so your argument is invalid.
I can tell you're an educated person and I'm suggesting that maybe you take a step back and really look at what you're arguing about
I can tell you're an educated person and I'm suggesting that maybe you take a step back and really look at what you're arguing about. A minecraft Pokemon server.
So I'm not allowed to criticize it? I don't understand your point at all.
You can whine about unfairness, and support arguments, and tear other people down on forums (like I have no doubt you'll try to do to me)
Your arguments are all very fallacious, you appeal to emotion quite a lot. Yes I'm going to tear down your argument, this is a debate on a topic I have posted which, when everyone has agreed on one point, then the logical step is for the Admins to consider it, and then ignore, or grant the suggestion.
but it doesn't change the fact that massive changes in the server system is out of your personal control. If people chose not to spend money on this server and enjoy the "challenge" then that's their choice
There's no challenge in pay walls because you can't endlessly grind to get to it, you can't get to it unless you pay money. I don't like how your phrasing your arguments at all. You appear to be attacking my character by using emotional appeal "Tear other people down", instead of saying "Tear down other peoples arguments", and the mocking use of "challenge".
To criticize the server owners, developers, and upkeepers for it seems like a cruddy thing to do (In my opinion).
I actually complimented the developers quite a lot but that is besides the point. If you think critisism is a "cruddy" thing to do, then I hope you never, ever, ever become an artist, or a politician. You know what happens when people are trapped in their own little bubble and aren't criticized? The bad star wars movies. Criticism is a natural part of having a business and criticism is good. No one is above criticism.
To conclude, I openly invite you to tear apart this paragraph
I openly invite you to critique, or how you put it, tear apart this reply too, as criticism is a good thing.
You can make that choice to waste your time looking for every flaw in my reasoning.
Oh I thought you were being genuine, but then I read the next sentence and found out you are just being spiteful. How nice.
Prove your hubris by proving my thinking wrong and your ideologies superior to what currently exists. I don't know about you, but I don't think it's worth it.
Cool.
When other people replied to me they had the common decency to not be a condescending person and just state their arguments.
Click to expand...